SAN FRANCISCO VOCATIONAL SERVICES

 

ANNUAL PROGRAM EVALUATION

 

FY00: 7/1/00 TO 6/30/01

 

Executive Summary

Descriptors for All Clients Served

The total number of clients served grew slightly from the prior year (359 in FY00, up from 340 in FY99. There were no significant changes in the age distribution of consumers: the incidence of disability increases with age, as reflected in the fact that 72% of consumers are 36 years of age or older. Men and women were served in nearly equal numbers. There were no changes in referral patterns: the bulk of referrals (58%) continue to come from the State Department of Rehabilitation.

There were minimal changes in patterns of persons served by type of disability. The percentage of persons served with orthopedic impairments grew slightly from 25% to 32%, while the percentage of persons with learning disabilities dropped from 10% to 6%. The largest categories of disability among consumers continue to be Orthopedic, Emotional, and Chronic Disease (especially HIV+). SFVS serves very few consumers with developmental disabilities, reflecting our specialization in computer and clerical skills training and placement for business office occupations.

The volume of initial referrals to both the COMPUTERS PLUS! program and the Transitional Employment Program (TEP) fell significantly, while there was a significant increase in initial referrals for Vocational Evaluation. These patterns reflect the fewer total number of unemployed persons with disabilities seeking vocational services in a strong economy, and those who do seek help may need more vocational assessment prior to training or placement.

Patterns of educational level are similar to the prior year. The majority of consumers (52%) claim some amount of postsecondary education. Only ten percent acknowledge less than a high school education. Consumer ethnic patterns are very similar to the prior year, with Caucasians at 44%, and significant numbers of blacks (20%), Asians (18%) and Hispanics (13%) served. Despite the high school or better education claimed by 90% of consumers, the average overall tested grade level for academic achievement is only 9.3, virtually unchanged from the prior year. The relatively low academic achievement of consumers is addressed by remedial coursework in English and math in COMPUTERS PLUS!

Vocational Evaluation

Expressed satisfaction with vocational evaluation services by referring counselors was generally positive but still fell below goal. While approximately three quarters of counselors expressed satisfaction, the goal was 90%. A modified procedure was used to collect feedback this year. Very few mailed questionnaires were returned, so referring counselors were surveyed by telephone. This method seems to have elicited a greater amount of critical responses than were received in the past. Much of this feedback was useful, but some of the negative criticism was unwarranted. One criticism indicated a perceived bias (conflict of interest) toward recommending clerical training; staff have been counseled to be aware of the concern. One criticism noted insufficient information about specific potential vocational goals. The service could be improved in this area. In some instances the feedback revealed that the counselors did not state their referral questions clearly enough: our staff need to probe more deeply to find out exactly what information the referring counselor is seeking. Consumers were very satisfied with vocational evaluation services, with 90% expressing satisfaction (goal was 70%.) Average daily attendance dropped from the prior year, from 1.6 to 1.33, below the budgeted ADA goal of 1.83. Lack of DR referrals accounted for all of the deficit. DR had substantial turnover in counselors this year, leading to fewer persons served and referred to programs like ours.

COMPUTERS PLUS!: Department of Rehabilitation

The actual graduation rate of 62% exceeded the goal (60%.) The percent of graduates who started employment was exactly on goal (70%), and represented a significant improvement from the prior year (54%.) Average hourly wage rate was above goal ($10.50 vs. $9.50), but represented a drop from the prior year ($11.15.) 90 day job retention was below goal (79% vs. 85%.) Consumer satisfaction was much improved from the prior year with 91% of students rating their experience "above satisfactory" (goal was 70%.) Average daily attendance dropped slightly from 12.21 in the prior year to 11.57. The budgeted ADA goal of 18 is not realistic: the DR contract called for a total monthly attendance of 20 unduplicated individuals, and this goal was exceeded.

COMPUTERS PLUS!: Special Programs

Many of the Special Programs outcomes exceeded goals and are very similar to the DR program outcomes, including graduation rate (64%), percent of graduates who start employment (74%..), and consumer satisfaction (95%.) However, Special Programs graduates earned a significantly higher wage ($12.16 per hour.) (Special Programs students, who include injured workers, tend to have more work experience than do Department of Rehabilitation students.) 90 day job retention was far below goal (65% vs. 85%), reflecting the fragile health status of many Special Programs students who are HIV+, and/or who have histories of substance abuse and who subsequently fail to maintain sobriety. ADA at 8.22 was almost exactly the same as in the prior year, again falling well below the budgeted ADA of 15. (The department was commensurately staffed with fewer FTE’s than was budgeted.)

Transitional Employment Program

TEP serves clients with the most significant barriers to employment, often including no work history or a negative work history and poor work habits. Nonetheless, most outcomes were very good. The graduation rate from TEP exceeded goal (82% vs. 80%), representing a great improvement over the prior year (65%.). The percentage of graduates who obtain employment was well above goal (74% vs. 55%), yet significantly lower than in the prior year (90%). Similarly, 70% of persons placed retained employment long term, well below the goal of 80% and below the level of the prior year (95%). Hourly wage rates were well above goal ($10.14 vs. $8.50), a significant improvement over the prior year ($8.37.). Consumer satisfaction rose significantly from the prior year (58%) and met the goal (71% vs. 70%), reflecting improved interpersonal skills of new TEP staff. Average Daily Attendance improved slightly over the prior year (10.31 vs. 10.16), but continued to fall well below goal (15.) The primary problem in achieving a higher ADA is the low wage paid in TEP ($7.64 per hour), which makes recruitment difficult. Employment in TEP is intended to provide transitional work experience, and is not an end goal.

Placement

The number and percentage of consumers obtaining employment fell off from the prior year. Fewer total consumers were served in Placement (167 vs. 213), reflecting a low unemployment rate in the general economy (and reduced need for the program), as well as the effects of chronic staff vacancies. 116 consumers (69%) obtained employment as compared with 160 individuals (75%) in the prior year. Persons who were served in Placement were persons who had remained long term unemployed in this year’s strong economy, and who tended to have more severe work-related deficits. On the positive side there was a substantial increase in average hourly wage over the prior year ($12.49 vs. $11.48.) The 90 day job retention rate continued to fall below goal (72% vs. 90%), but this goal may be set unrealistically high. Consumer satisfaction fell significantly from the prior year (59% vs. 84%), and was below goal (70%.) To some extent this is caused by ongoing staff shortages, which result in less availability of intensive, individualized service. Also well below goal was the percent of placed consumers who were quick to obtain employment (49% vs. 70%), again a significant drop from the prior year (74%.). The Placement department urgently needs to fill vacancies with competent staff.

SAN FRANCISCO VOCATIONAL SERVICES

ALL CLIENTS

CLIENT DESCRIPTORS REPORT OF 7/1/00 THROUGH 6/30/01

 

7/1/99 to 6/30/00

7/1/00 to 6/30/01

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

1) Clients served

340

100%

359

100%

2) Age: 18-25

26-35

36-45

46-54

55+

39

74

100

87

40

11%

22%

30%

25%

12%

31

70

109

104

45

9%

19%

30%

29%

13%

3) Sex: Male

Female

170

170

50%

50%

182

177

51%

49%

4) Referral source:

1-Department of Rehabilitation

2-Private Insurance

3-Department of Human Services

4-Self

5-Other

 

195

55

0

42

48

 

57%

16%

0%

12%

15%

 

209

62

1

43

44

 

58%

17%

1%

12%

12%

5) Primary Disability:

1-Visually impaired

2-Hearing impaired

3-Orthopedic

4-Emotional

5-Drug/alcohol

6-Developmentally Disabled

7-Chronic disease

8-Learning disabled

9-Neurological

10-Other

 

28

8

87

65

29

6

50

33

25

9

 

8%

2%

25%

19%

8%

2%

15%

10%

8%

3%

 

30

7

114

65

23

5

53

23

33

6

 

9%

2%

32%

18%

6%

1%

16%

6%

9%

1%

Period 7/1/99 – 6/30/00

6) Reason for referral:

1-PreBOOT Assessment

2-PreTEP Assessment

3-PreOJT Assessment

4-Direct placement

5-Vocational Evaluation

6-Clerical Assessment in BOOT

 

 

156

65

19

86

103

3

 

 

35%

14%

4%

19%

23%

1%

   

Period 7/1/00 – 6/30/01

6) Reason for referral:

1-Computers PLUS! Assessment

2-TEP Assessment

3-HEC Assessment

4-Direct placement

5-Vocational Evaluation

6-Training, No Assessment

7-PreOJT Assessment

   

 

 

97


19

9

87

124

15

8

 

 

27%


5%

3%

24%

35%

4%

2%

7) Educational Level

1-8th Grade or lower

2-Some high school

3-High school/equivalency

4-Some college

5-College graduate

6-Some graduate studies

7-Graduate school

8-Other

 

10

39

113

121

50

1

5

1

 

3%

11%

33%

34%

15%

1%

2%

1%

 

10

26

136

121

47

4

15

0

 

3%

7%

38%

34%

13%

1%

4%

0%

8) Ethnicity:

1-Caucasian

2-Black (non-Hispanic)

3-Asian

4-Hispanic

5-Native American

6-Other

 

152

83

49

47

2

7

 

44%

24%

15%

14%

1%

2%

 

158

72

65

45

4

15

 

44%

20%

18%

13%

1%

4%

9) TABE Grade level scores:

Language Mechanics

Language Expression

Reading Comprehension

Vocabulary

Math Computation

Math Concepts

Spelling

Overall

 

8.3

9.0

10.2

10.1

8.3

8.5

8.3

9.1

 

 

8.2

8.8

9.7

9.9

8.8

9.2

8.2

9.3

 

 

SAN FRANCISCO VOCATIONAL SERVICES

ANNUAL PROGRAM EVALUATION 7/1/00 to 6/30/01

 PROGRAM: COMPUTERS PLUS! OFFICE SKILLS TRAINING PROGRAM:
DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

MEASURE

FOR YEAR
7/1/99 TO 6/30/00

FOR YEAR
7/1/00 TO 6/30/01 

ACTUAL  GOAL ACTUAL GOAL

1) Develop clerical skills to meet job objectives

Percentage students served achieving full competencies – ("graduation rate")

61%
27/44

60%

62%
21/34

60%

2) Maximize employability1

Percentage of graduates placed in employment

54%
12/22

(2) clients not contracted for placement services;
(3) clients still active in job search

70%

70%
14/20

(1) client not contracted for placement services;
(3) still active in job search;
(3) ended SFVS placement to follow
VI Placement Specialist

70%

3) Maximize income and independence1

Average hourly wage

$11.15

$9.50

$10.50

$9.50

4) Maximize job retention1

90-day job retention rate

 

 

100%
12/12

85%

79%
11/14

85%

5) Consumer satisfaction

Percentage of consumers rating overall training experience "Above Satisfactory"

68%
65/95

70%

91%
49/54

70%

6) Program efficiency

Average daily attendance

12.21

18

11.57

18

1. Objectives 2, 3, and 4 based on clients who received placement services. Objectives 1, 5 and 6 based on all clients

SAN FRANCISCO VOCATIONAL SERVICES

ANNUAL PROGRAM EVALUATION 7/1/00 TO 6/30/01

 PROGRAM: COMPUTERS PLUS! OFFICE SKILLS TRAINING PROGRAM:
SPECIAL PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT

Serving PAES, Workers Comp, CalWORKS, and HEC Clients

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

MEASURE

FOR YEAR
7/1/99TO 6/30/00

FOR YEAR
7/1/00 TO 6/30/01

ACTUAL  GOAL ACTUAL GOAL

1) Develop clerical skills to meet job objectives

Percentage of students served achieving full competencies - ("graduation rate")

70%
25/36

60%

64%
28/44

0%

2) Maximize employability1

Percentage of graduates placed in employment

85%
17/20

4 clients not contracted for placement services;
1 client moved out of state after completing training

70%

74%
17/23

1 client not contracted for placement services;
1 client continued training at City College,
3 clients still active in placement services

70%

3) Maximize income and independence1

Average hourly wage

$10.49

$9.50

$12.16

$9.50

4) Maximize job retention1

90-day job retention rate

 

 

88%
15/17

85%

65%
11/17

85%

5) Consumer satisfaction

Percentage of consumers rating overall training experience "Above Satisfactory"

68%
22/32

70%

95%
84/88

70%

6) Program efficiency

Average daily attendance

8.25

15

8.22

15

1. Objectives 2, 3, and 4 based on clients who received placement services. Objectives 1, 5 and 6 based on all clients. 

SAN FRANCISCO VOCATIONAL SERVICES

ANNUAL PROGRAM EVALUATION 7/1/00 TO 6/30/01

  PROGRAM: PLACEMENT

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

MEASURE

FOR YEAR
7/1/99 TO 6/30/00

FOR YEAR
7/1/00 TO 6/30/01

ACTUAL  GOAL ACTUAL  GOAL

1) Obtain competitive employment

Percentage of persons obtaining 1st day of employment

75%
160/213

70%

69%
116/167

70%

2) Obtain a competitive wage

Average hourly wage

$11.48

$8.75

$12.49

$8.75

3) Retain stable employment

Percentage of placements retained 90 days

77%
120/155

(5 clients are pending 90 days)

90%

72%
83/116

90%

4) Place persons with significant disabilities

Percent of persons placed who have significant disabilities

81%
129/160

85%

75%
87/116

85%

5) Consumer satisfaction

Percentage of consumers rating overall placement experience "Above Satisfactory"

84%
21/25

70%

59%
22/37

70%

6) Program efficiency

Percent who were quick to obtain appropriate employment (<120 days)

74%
118/160

70%

49%
56/116

70%

 

SAN FRANCISCO VOCATIONAL SERVICES

ANNUAL PROGRAM EVALUATION 7/1/00 TO 6/30/01

  PROGRAM: TRANSITIONAL EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (I, II & III)

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

MEASURE

FOR YEAR
7/1/99 TO 6/30/00

FOR YEAR
7/1/00 TO 6/30/01

ACTUAL  GOAL ACTUAL  GOAL

1) Obtain valuable work skills

Graduation rate: percentage of enrollees who attain full competencies

65%
24/37

80%

82%
23/28

80%

2) Obtain competitive employment

Percentage of graduates who obtain employment

90%
20/22

(2 clients still receiving placement services)

55%

74%
17/23

(2 clients still receiving placement services)

55%

3) Obtain a competitive wage

Average hourly wage

$8.37

$8.50

$10.14

$8.50

4) Ensure adequate job adjustment and retention

Percent obtaining 90-day job retention

95%
19/20

80%

70%
16/23

80%

5) Consumer satisfaction

Percentage of consumers rating overall training experience "Above Satisfactory"

58%
11/19

70%

71%
10/14

70%

6) Program efficiency

Average Daily Attendance

10.16

15

10.31

15

SAN FRANCISCO VOCATIONAL SERVICES

ANNUAL PROGRAM EVALUATION 7/1/00 TO 6/30/01

PROGRAM: VOCATIONAL EVALUATION

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

MEASURE

FOR  YEAR
7/1/99 TO 6/30/00

FOR YEAR
7/1/00 TO 6/30/01

ACTUAL  GOAL ACTUAL  GOAL

1) Appropriate response to referral questions

Counselor questionnaire

100%
2/2

90%

76%
22/29

90%

2) Prompt scheduling of referred client

Counselor questionnaire

100%
2/2

90%

72%
13/18

90%

3) Assist referring counselor in setting vocational goals for client

Counselor questionnaire

100%
2/2

90%

74%
17/23

90%

4) Written report clear and easy to read

Counselor questionnaire

100%
2/2

90%

66%
20/30

90%

5) Consumer satisfaction

Percentage of consumers rating overall evaluation experience "Above Satisfactory"

86%
62/72

70%

90%
55/61

70%

6) Program efficiency

Average daily attendance

1.6

1.83

1.33

1.83

 

RETURN TO PROGRAM EVALUATION CHOICES